I want to apologize if this post is wrong, but I saw here a lot of people asking for SIP trunk providers that doesn’t require KYC for routes.
I want to present in front of you our offer.
If you’re running a carrier, call center, or ITSP and need clean, high-quality voice routes — check this out:
Premium CLI routes — Germany, Netherlands, USA, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria
Here is the link
Are you serious about this? Like this is some joke ass pricing…
There’s no reality in which I would ever pay (or expect others to pay) $95 USD per month per number You’re asking a business with 5 numbers to pay almost $500/month for this.
So let’s see, do the KYC and pay like $.80/month for numbers with usage OR pay 11,775% more for a number (usage better be included) and not have to do KYC.
You not requiring KYC isn’t enough to offset the costs of not doing KYC. I’d just rather do KYC since, you know, I don’t have anything shady to hide.
You also can’t guarantee STIR/SHAKEN as you are not participating in it and a International Gateway provider has to deal with it on your traffic anyways.
I suspect the whole concept is to provide service to scammers who don’t want financial records or any other info attached to doing business with the company. I suppose scammers could afford that much as the price to pay for being able to avoid sending caller-id or conforming to STIR/SHAKEN requirements. Such a company would not last long before numerous governments track them down.
Well it’s also Crypto first. The entire thing screams exit scam and I wouldn’t trust them at all. Oh and the domain was registered two weeks ago.
So SCAM SCAM SCAM. @voxiotelecom Is this a scamming scam scam you’s running?
Unless your traffic is originating from US/Canada (both do STIR/SHAKEN) then all the traffic has go to through proper Foreign Gateway Providers who then determine what the SHAKEN attestation will be. These guys can’t assign attestation that means anything.
If you do not have a real presence in the US, you can’t do STIR/SHAKEN directly.
Well, guys, take this slow. We can provide testing for real clients. There’s no scam, in same way, there’s no minimum payment, so everyone can test our services. It’s a service for privacy focused customers. That’s why we request higher prices than other companies.
Ha? You joke with me? How can you write those things? I will report you. We have a big LIVE CHAT AND CONTACT DETAILS!
Report me for what? Missing the contacts details hidden at the bottom of the page? Sure, go head. Your website has existed since July 26, 2026, lacks anything a serious wholesaler would do, the pricing is outrageous and the preferred payment methods leave the payer high and dry with no way to refund or protect their money. Yes, you do accept wire transfers and card payments so don’t freak about that.
Also this:
STIR/SHAKEN ready
Attestation A on US/Canada Premium routes for legitimate calling identity.
That’s not allowed under STIR/SHAKEN. SS doesn’t assign A’s to International CallerID’s. Only calls originating with the US/Canada to US/Canada are assigned A’s if criteria is met. Calls originating from networks outside the US can’t present US CallerID’s.
So since International CallerID’s can’t be an A and only US/CA to US/CA calls can be assigned an A…something shady is going on here.
The prices are outrageous and nonsensical, you don’t do 1B+ minutes a year, and Vodafone need to have a little look into enforcing their VOXI trademark.
I can’t find ICO, RID, ADR, just a virtual or shared workspace address. Don’t make big claims without inviting scrutiny. @BlazeStudios is right to call you out.
2026 VoxioTelecom Ltd. All rights reserved. Registered in England & Wales. does not exist at Companies House. Flagged.
These scammers are becoming really audacious, leaving their telegram groups and coming into the mainstream communities.
VoIP business is slow for legitimate folks as well as these illegitimates
Quite a few businesses share the same number +44 20 4525 0000, which is weird because no one answered when I called.
I have noticed recently that Criminals and scammers, once caught, no longer apologize, but immediately attack, threaten and make accusations.
Like a scammer that calls you and you know they are a scammer, point that out and they start cursing you out with indignant self righteousness
We had a police chief and his prosecutor wife here in Hawaii that was caught and are both currently serving prison time. They did exactly that - once accusations came out about their wrongdoing, they started suing everyone that reported on them.
Former Honolulu deputy prosecutor Katherine Kealoha did not merely sue her accusers; she and her then-husband, Honolulu Police Chief Louis Kealoha, aggressively used the legal system and fabricated evidence against them. When her uncle Gerard Puana and grandmother Florence Puana sued her for financial theft, Katherine fought back in civil court and initially won a judgment against them, before a massive federal corruption probe revealed she had framed her uncle for a staged mailbox theft
(my personal opinion, scammers should be publicly “dealt with” on TV for the world to see)
Our service is not a scam, it works 100%.
Things like Exit Scams work…until they don’t. It working does not equal “not a scam”.
Scam may not be the right word, however it does sound like what you are offering is allowing traffic for scammers. If you are certifying US to US calls without KYC then you are likely to get hit by FCC, particularly as you’ve publically stated your intentions to flout the law!
They can’t certify US to US calls, they are not in the US and cannot participate in STIR/SHAKEN. They are foreign entity meaning their traffic into the US must go through a Foreign Gateway Provider who participates in STIR/SHAKEN and all International calls get a C basically. You also can’t originate calls from outside the US to the US and present a US CallerID. The claim they can provide A attestation to US/Canada calls is shady since it’s not allowed.
Now who would get slammed by the FCC is the FGP that is signing these calls with an A and/or allowing US CallerID to be passed.
That’s not all strictly true, routing US to US calls with US DIDs via our platform (albeit via further upstream providers) is possible as we’ve paid a lot of money to get this sorted by people far more clued up than me and we have a US legal entity for tax etc. However, we still do all of the KYC etc. to make sure we are compliant.
There are a number of big players in the UK that interpret the rules differently in terms of Attestation levels but this is off the charts wrong.
Right, you have a US presence and are registered due to that…that changes how it is handled. Those without a US presence and are not registered have different rules.
Guys, calm down.
We are just resellers, our providers allow us to do those kind of services. If we receive reports, we handle them. We are not hiding.
I don’t know why any of us are wasting time on this and I encourage @penguinpbx to remove the thread and block your account.
But seeing as you want to keep on winding us up, your entire website is a treasure trove of BS and I have never seen anything quite like it in an 18+ year career in this industry.
Politely: jog on, mate.
Sample invite
INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.0.0.12:5061;branch=z9hG4bK...
From: "Alice" <sip:[email protected]>
To: <sip:[email protected]>
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:[email protected]>
Route: <sip:[email protected];lr>
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5061;transport=tls>
Content-Type: application/sdp
According to GoDaddy
GREAT NAME
£0.01
1st yr only with 3 yr term