Hi all, I am new to these forums so if I do something wrong … my bad.
I am from the UK and I am going to be setting up a phone system for a friends business and we will be using the FreePBX distro. We are also wanting a file server on site and need to work out the best possible solution for our needs, bearing in mind pricing of hardware e.t.c. and also expandability in the future.
I have thought of the following solutions however am unsure which would be best.
Solution 1 (1 server):
Server1: Windows Server 2008 standard as a base system, acting as a file server and backup server > FreePBX would be run virtually somehow.
Solution 2 (2 servers):
Server 1-higher powered: Windows Server 2008 standard acting solely as a file server and backup server.
Server 2-lower powered: FreePBX distro installed and running standalone.
Solution 3 (2 servers):
Server 1-higher powered: FreeNAS running as a file server and backup server.
Server 2-lower powered: FreePBX distro installed and running standalone.
Solution 1 would obviously be a much more powerful than the individual servers in solutions 2&3.
I have been in contact with Dell and they quoted me the following for solution 1:
3x 500GB HDD’s hot plug (RAID 5)
1x PERC H710 Adapter RAID Controller, 512MB NV Cache
2x Intel Xeon E5-2407 2.20GHz, 10M Cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, No Turbo, 4C, 80W
4x 4GB UDIMM, 1333 MHz, Low Volt, Dual Rank
1x Dual, Hot-plug, Redundant Power Supply (1+1), 750W
1x Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Standard Edition, English, Incl. 5 CALs
4x 5-pack of Windows Server 2008 User CALs
£2808.32 All up (ex shipping + vat)
Any solutions? I thought this was a ridiculous price as I would need to pay for user licences to enable me to set up users on the Windows server to enable me to set specific file permissions. I’m inclined to go with Solution 3, would anyone recommend this in a small business environment? Seems pointless purchasing Windows Server 2008 as user licences would need to be purchased, antivirus software would be required e.t.c. Whereas with FreeNAS I could get away without all of the extra costing?
The owner asked if it was possible to combine the need for two servers into one to save on physical space but also to save money, however it seems best to run two individual servers for our requirements? No chance of the phone system being affected if the file system went down e.t.c.?
I really need some advice guys as this is turning into a much bigger problem than it really needs to be.