My guess is we will hear nothing at all. Sangoma does not care about the community. We might after a week get some official response after 5 teams have vetted it and it will be all BS just like the lip service they gave @apiban in the past.
I completely agree with this. The amount of time a select few spend assisting users in this community on their own dime to allow Sangoma to profit by the growth of FreePBX needs to come to an end until they agree to make changes here. A few names that come to mind are; @lgaetz@BlazeStudios@FreerPBXer@franckdanard@xrobau
…last seen enjoying some of the weekend and Veterans Day work-life balance.
There’s been no change in the Conduct of Conduct regarding ad hominem attacks. The project suffers when new users get inadvertently mired in that kind of fud-mud. Warnings will continue to be issued before temporary and/or permanent bans.
Are you suggesting that you would be “Happy to discuss @dicko” with anyone in the closed source “Open Source Office Hours!” program or perhaps that you would ‘discuss’ #FreeJames with me (@dicko) privately?
Either ways I think not keeping all this in the open would surely continue to sow fear and loathing in FreePBX land.
Well, its Office Hours, which is typically smaller than, say, an Open House – will get the latter set up soon, was taking it step-by-step not quite ninety days green into the OSSA
Not sure how to interpret your metaphorical post, but I think elephants and cowboy hats fit more comfortably in Open Houses than an Advocates Lobbies ( no spurious punctuation or emoticons from me today !! )