I’ll simply say that the help on the forums can only be as good as the amount of >information that you provide. The issue you are having can not be reproduced by >anyone who has tried to do such.
Ok, i’m alone with these problem, bad luck.
If you want to get to the bottom of this then you are going to have to help >yourself a bit more. Since you are obviously comfortable enough to at least >touch the code, you may want to start instrumenting the function in question >with some debug tracing to find out why it is not working on your system.
Is not a problem for me try to put a bit of verbose into the code, but that’s not what the bug track system said.
Furthermore, you may want to make the effort in places like the bug tracker to >read the trac formatting requirements so that the information you put in there >is readable. Plenty of people have pasted information that did not format >correctly because it is a form of “wiki” and expects it’s own ‘language’ when >entering information. However, the people who cared enough to get the help and >their information across go back when they realize their slip and re-enter it so >it is readable.
Ok, i will admit can be my fault, the las post at the bugtrack system was not readable, but i don’t know if really matter as the bug was already closed.
Could there be a bug somewhere in FreePBX that is causing this, sure, it’s >lways possible. However, if it is, it is something very bizarre because the code >is very straight forward that generates this list. I can also say that there is >nothing from any of the information that you have provided on this issue of >yours that points to a bug.
Another point I would like to make concerning your comment, the Forums are also >only as good as the community’s involvement in helping each other. You have >obviously been using FreePBX for many years as you have filed a number of bugs >going back over 4 years, and bug reports are always appreciated and valuable for >all. However, it would appear you have never spent any time in the forums until >this thread, either posting or responding to others. Of course there is nothing >anywhere that says it is anyone’s duty to do such, but to come out with a >comment like let’s see how good is these forum and the closed bug track first, >don’t you think so? in light of these facts is a bit presumptuous, “don’t you >think so?”
Dont’ you think so, that after posting a “bug” or not, posting into the forum, and getting as response: maybe you want to get into a bounty for a module!!! is really not a good way to solve any problem.
As far as SkykingOH’s remark wrt to custom context, my statements have nothing >to do with that though if it turns out that you do in fact use that module, then >I would tend to agree with him and if not then it would not be relevant
Will try to repost info at the closed “bug”, maybe these info can help someone in the future.