PJSIP vs CHAN_SIP feature and functional parity

[tm1000 (Andrew Nagy)]

@BlazeStudios

Cisco is notorious for not following RFC standards and doing things their own way. cough SCCP cough . In my over decade of experience in dealing with SIP endpoints/systems, the only decent SIP devices Cisco has are the SPA series and they BOUGHT LINKSYS for them.

Here’s the reasoning.

@tmittelstaedt

And I would use Cisco phones. Why? Simple. Users associate Cisco with higher end stuff and assume that just because it’s a Cisco phone on their desk, that it’s a Cisco PBX.

@BlazeStudios

I’d love to see some debugs and logs because I’m curious as to what the real issue is.

Doubt it.

@tmittelstaedt

Darn it Andrew I’ve got a POTS gateway that doesn’t work with pjsip, now I’ll have to go through the bother of setting up a test server and filing a proper bug report…

Any real effort just elicits eye rolls.

The whole reason pjsip is terrible is because a Cisco POTS gateway has issues connecting over pjsip. Unsure what the issues are.