I have a fresh install of Centos 6.2
Fresh install of Asterisk 11.2.1
Fresh install of freepbx-2.10.0.tar.gz
During the freepbx install, it did puke on the version of asterisk saying that it was not supported. I disabled the checks for the asterisk version, and freepbx did complete it’s installation.
When I go to the web interface for the first time, and try to login to the web interface, when I hit the submit button, nothing happens (with or without the proper credentials).
Here are some logs:
My httpd access log:
x.x.x.x - - [10/Mar/2013:01:33:56 +0000] “POST /admin/config.php HTTP/1.1” 200 5595 “http://myip/admin/config.php” "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0"
x.x.x.x - - [10/Mar/2013:01:33:57 +0000] “GET /admin/assets/css/mstyle_autogen_1362877907.css?load_version= HTTP/1.1” 304 - “http://myip/admin/config.php” "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0"
x.x.x.x - - [10/Mar/2013:01:33:57 +0000] “GET /admin/assets/js/pbxlib.js?load_version= HTTP/1.1” 304 - “http://myip/admin/config.php” "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0"
x.x.x.x - - [10/Mar/2013:01:33:57 +0000] “GET /admin/images/freepbx_small.png?load_version= HTTP/1.1” 304 - “http://myip/admin/config.php” “Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0”
(IPs removed)
“. . . During the freepbx install, it did puke on the version of asterisk saying that it was not supported. I disabled the checks for the asterisk version, and freepbx did complete it’s installation. . . .”
Why do you think it is supported? I’m sure for “lots of reasons” also
I thought FreePBX was better than it actually is I guess. Oh, and because it’s supported in the beta version, and many others claim to be running it.
What are your “lots of reasons” for being a dick with nothing better to do than sit in a “technical” forum and question the business drivers behind not wanting to use an .iso distribution rather than try and be helpful?
The install script is just a bash script it is well documented. You who are obviously not as good as you thought you were obviously “did it wrong” because you are right in that many are testing it out running it and some even reciprocating by filing noticed bugs as appropriate.
You however have “lots of reasons” for not participating in any way but pissing and moaning . Maybe it is you who should be questioning your “business drivers” WhateverTF they are.
To be helpfuljust get of your high horse, install from the beta distro, note your problems and stop feeling entitled to anything. So far you have got exactly what you invested. We generally get a similar and equitable return it is not zero. . .
We are about to go into RC soon and in all reality it’s really less of a beta than other software betas I have seen. 2.10 can be a pain on manual installs because we didn’t start fixing the manual install issues until 2.11
