[Amportal-users] FreePBX Zap Trunk config question

General Help
1

Mike,

Did you set context=from-zaptel in zapata.conf? By default, the zap channels come into from-pstn. The from-pstn context does not examine inbound routes for Zap channels. You must set this manually in your zapata.conf file for this route to work properly.

Alex

On 7/24/06, M.A. Hockings <[email protected] ([email protected])> wrote: [quote]Here we have two lines, on a PSTN line connected to a Zaptel card and
the other a VOIP line.  Initially I configured them as two trunks,  one
for VOIP and one for the Zap channel.   For each I configured their own
inbound route "voip-number DID / any CID"  and  "Zap Chanel 1-1"  and
pointed them to a common ring group.  With this config I found that an
incoming call on the Zap (PSTN) line would get the "not in service"
answer.  To get around this I defined an additional "any DID / any CID"
incoming route and it all works as desired.

Why is the “any DID / any CID” route needed to make the Zap line work,
it just seems incorrect somehow.

Mike

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net’s Techsay panel and you’ll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys – and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Amportal-users mailing list
[email protected] ([email protected])
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amportal-users
[/quote]

–
Alex Robar
[email protected] ([email protected])

Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)

2

Thanks Alex !

Your response gave me the confidence that it should work and I just
had to figure out the magic to make it work. I had tried both
from-zaptel and from-pstn. The trunk was defined for channel 1 with max
of 1 channels so I defined the incoming route for l channel only –
Zaptel channel 1-1. This was the problem as when I changed it simply to
channel 1 rather than the more explicit 1-1 and it works!

Now I’ve done away with the “any DID / any CID” incoming route and all
is fine.

Mike

Alex Robar wrote:

[quote] Mike,

Did you set context=from-zaptel in zapata.conf? By default, the zap
channels come into from-pstn. The from-pstn context does not examine
inbound routes for Zap channels. You must set this manually in your
zapata.conf file for this route to work properly.

Alex

On 7/24/06, M.A. Hockings <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

 Here we have two lines, on a PSTN line connected to a Zaptel card and
 the other a VOIP line.  Initially I configured them as two
 trunks,  one
 for VOIP and one for the Zap channel.   For each I configured
 their own
 inbound route "voip-number DID / any CID"  and  "Zap Chanel 1-1"  and
 pointed them to a common ring group.  With this config I found
 that an
 incoming call on the Zap (PSTN) line would get the "not in service"
 answer.  To get around this I defined an additional "any DID / any
 CID"
 incoming route and it all works as desired.

 Why is the "any DID / any CID" route needed to make the Zap line work,
 it just seems incorrect somehow.

 Mike

[/quote]

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net’s Techsay panel and you’ll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys – and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Amportal-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amportal-users

Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)

3

Even if my fix didn’t get you going, at least it proded you in the right direction.

Glad to help!

Alex

On 7/24/06, M.A. Hockings < [email protected] ([email protected])> wrote:[quote]Thanks Alex !

Your response gave me the confidence that it should work and I just
had to figure out the magic to make it work.  I had tried both
from-zaptel and from-pstn.  The trunk was defined for channel 1 with max
of 1 channels so I defined the incoming route for l  channel only –
Zaptel channel 1-1.  This was the problem as when I changed it simply to
channel 1 rather than the more explicit 1-1 and it works!

Now I’ve done away with the “any DID / any CID” incoming route and all
is fine.

Mike

Alex Robar wrote:

[quote] Mike,

[/quote] > Did you set context=from-zaptel in zapata.conf? By default, the zap

[quote] channels come into from-pstn. The from-pstn context does not examine
inbound routes for Zap channels. You must set this manually in your
zapata.conf file for this route to work properly.

Alex

On 7/24/06, M.A. Hockings <[email protected] ([email protected])
<mailto: [email protected] ([email protected])>> wrote:

     Here we have two lines, on a PSTN line connected to a Zaptel card and
     the other a VOIP line.  Initially I configured them as two
     trunks,  one
     for VOIP and one for the Zap channel.   For each I configured
     their own
     inbound route "voip-number DID / any CID"  and  "Zap Chanel 1-1"  and
     pointed them to a common ring group.  With this config I found
     that an
     incoming call on the Zap (PSTN) line would get the "not in service"
     answer.  To get around this I defined an additional "any DID / any
     CID"
     incoming route and it all works as desired.

     Why is the “any DID / any CID” route needed to make the Zap line work,
     it just seems incorrect somehow.

     Mike

[/quote]

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net’s Techsay panel and you’ll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys – and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Amportal-users mailing list
[email protected] ([email protected])
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amportal-users
[/quote]

–
Alex Robar
[email protected] ([email protected])

Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)

4

I have the same context, more or less. I have one PSTN and a old PBX connected to my Sangoma Card A102.

In my zapata.conf, i put the context pointed to “from-zaptel”, but whatever i do i have the same result:

When someone calls to me extensions, i have this:

– Starting simple switch on ‘Zap/1-1’
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, "Entering from-zaptel with DID == ") in new stack
– Executing Ringing(“Zap/1-1”, “”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “DID=s”) in new stack
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “DID is now s”) in new stack
– Executing GotoIf(“Zap/1-1”, “1?zapok:notzap”) in new stack
– Goto (from-zaptel,s,Cool
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “Is a Zaptel Channel”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “CHAN=1-1”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “CHAN=1”) in new stack
– Executing Macro(“Zap/1-1”, “from-zaptel-1|s|1”) in new stack
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “Returned from Macro from-zaptel-1”) in new stack
– Executing Goto(“Zap/1-1”, “from-pstn|s|1”) in new stack
– Goto (from-pstn,s,1)
– Hungup ‘Zap/1-1’
– Starting simple switch on ‘Zap/1-1’
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, "Entering from-zaptel with DID == ") in new stack
– Executing Ringing(“Zap/1-1”, “”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “DID=s”) in new stack
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “DID is now s”) in new stack
– Executing GotoIf(“Zap/1-1”, “1?zapok:notzap”) in new stack
– Goto (from-zaptel,s,Cool
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “Is a Zaptel Channel”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “CHAN=1-1”) in new stack
– Executing Set(“Zap/1-1”, “CHAN=1”) in new stack
– Executing Macro(“Zap/1-1”, “from-zaptel-1|s|1”) in new stack
– Executing NoOp(“Zap/1-1”, “Returned from Macro from-zaptel-1”) in new stack
– Executing Goto(“Zap/1-1”, “from-pstn|s|1”) in new stack
– Goto (from-pstn,s,1)
– Hungup ‘Zap/1-1’

In freepbx how can i configure the zaptel channel in inbound routes? If someone calls me i want it to pass to the analog extensions. Freepbx can do this? If i put on “catch all” i can forward the calls to one sip extension, and this works fine, but i dont want that.

Thx. Best regards.